Wit and wisdom of a miner's son turned maverick
ALTHOUGH he was selected for a bishop's mitre by an old style prince
of the church, Archbishop James Scanlan, Tom Winning has never been easy
to fit into a mould.
Maverick and outspoken -- his attack on the Prince of Wales for making
light of dogma, or his opposition to the Falklands and Gulf wars are but
two examples -- he has his roots in the west coast Irish Catholic
tradition and the style of an earthy socialist.
Yet he approved recent attacks on the Labour Party's abortion policy.
He has vociferously defended Catholic schools, zealously put Vatican II
policies into practice, and adopted a pastoral plan for the archdiocese
to the delight of his supporters.
Some of his ambition came unstuck when financial disaster struck the
diocese but he has shrugged it off and will now become a significant
figure on a wider stage when he dons the red hat of a cardinal.
A warm and witty man, he once turned to me outside a radio studio in
which Tridentine mass devotee Gerald Warner was inveighing against the
venal liberality of Vatican ways in his plummy tones. ''See that
fella,'' said TJ in his Lanarkshire accent, ''he's got a few chips on
his shoulder -- and a few in his mooth as well.''
Thomas Joseph Winning was born in Wishaw, the son of a miner who lost
his job before the Depression and knew real hardship. Ordained to a
charge at Motherwell, he served in various Lanark
shire parishes before being appointed bishop-auxiliary in Glasgow in
1971.
Within three years, he was made archbishop and
his ascent to the higher levels of the church had begun. Among the
highlights of the last two decades were his becoming the first Roman
Catholic to address the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland in
1975, and the visit of the Pope to Glasgow in 1982.
We are unlikely to see Cardinal Winning making waves in the Tiber, but
compared with most of this weekend's new cardinals he will be a moderate
middle-of-the-road sort of chap.
He said yesterday that he believed much of the Catholic orthodoxy was
''unchangeable'', but that the church had to be more open in the way it
set out to attract support.
''The message will be the same, but the methodology should be
different. As I have said before, you don't use yesterday's tools to do
today's job.''
Cardinal Winning added: ''The church the Second Vatican Council spoke
about, and what I want to see, is a church of participation and a
friendly church, where the rays of Christ shine more clearly.
''It means changing lots of attitudes, getting rid of authoritarian
approaches, and seeing authority as a service. I like people, and I'm
very keen to have dialogue with different groups.''
He described the Pope as a very nice man with a good sense of humour,
who had instituted a marked move towards increased consultation within
the church.
However, of the 167 living cardinals, 85% have now been appointed by
John Paul II in the 16 years of his pontificate and, of the 120 entitled
to vote on his successor, 100 have been selected personally by him.
It is hardly controversial to point out that most of them have
conformed to his traditionalist and theologically conservative views.
One might say that the Pope has loaded the dice so that his successor
will be someone who thinks like him.
Among the heavy sprinkling of Vatican curia types, there are also a
few from countries in which Catholicism is (or was until recently) the
bulwark against a communist regime -- a reflection of the Polish
pontiff's passionate anti-communism.
As well as a recognition of the significant role that Catholicism has
in Scotland today, the presence of a Scottish Cardinal in Glasgow will
add to the clout which the RC church enjoys in the West of Scotland.
On the ecumenical front, Archbishop Winning was an active, if cautious
player. Observers should not look for any immediate relaxation of style
on inter-faith marriages.
The face under the hat will remain much the same, even if the smile
from today onwards will understandably be a little broader.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article